PARIS (AFP, REUTERS) – Twelve major football clubs announced a new European Super League on Monday (April 19), breaking away from the Uefa Champions League and prompting an angry response from fans, politicians and their domestic leagues.
Here are the main things to know about the new venture:
1. What happened?
Twelve heavyweights from England, Spain and Italy agreed to establish a new competition, the Super League, governed by its founding clubs. This challenges the supremacy of Europe’s top club competition, the Uefa-run Champions League.
Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United and Tottenham Hotspur were the English clubs involved, Atletico Madrid, Barcelona and Real Madrid are the Spanish teams and the Italian sides are AC Milan, Inter Milan and Juventus. The teams have 99 European titles between them.
Three more teams are expected to join as founding clubs, which are guaranteed participation each year, with another five qualifying annually, making it a 20-team competition. Games will be mid-week, ruling teams out of the Champions League but leaving them free for domestic fixtures.
2. What’s the format?
The inaugural edition will take place “as soon as practicable”, the announcement said.
With an August start, it will feature two groups of 10 playing home and away, and the top three qualifying for the quarter-finals.
The fourth and fifth-placed teams will play off for the remaining quarter-final spots. The quarter and semi-finals will be played over two legs and the final is a single game at a neutral venue.
There are also plans for a women’s version.
3. What’s behind all this?
Europe’s top clubs have long agitated for the income that guaranteed, annual competition against their fellow powers would bring. Currently, they have to qualify for the Champions League by placing high in their domestic competitions, and then make it through the season-long tournament to reach the high-profile latter stages.
The clubs, saddled with big debts and huge wages for their star players, say the pandemic has “accelerated the instability in the existing European football economic model”.
The Super League will bring them far more than the Champions League. The founding clubs are expected to receive more than €10 billion (S$16 billion) in uncapped “solidarity payments” during their initial commitment period.
They will also receive €3.5 billion for infrastructure investment and to offset their losses from the pandemic.
By comparison, Uefa competitions generated €3.2 billion in TV earnings in the pre-pandemic 2018-2019 season.
4. What was the reaction?
The condemnation was widespread and swift. European football’s governing body Uefa and English, Spanish and Italian football authorities issued a joint statement threatening to ban participating clubs from “any other competition at domestic, European or world level”. Players could even be barred from their national teams, they said.
World body Fifa said it “can only express its disapproval” about a competition “outside of the international football structures”.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the plans were “very damaging for football” and “would strike at the heart of the domestic game”. French President Emmanuel Macron praised French clubs for not taking part.
Fans were also incensed, with the Chelsea and Tottenham supporters’ trusts calling it a “betrayal”, and the Arsenal Supporters Trust saying it was the “death of Arsenal as a sporting institution”.
Former Manchester United defender Gary Neville, now a TV pundit, said he was “disgusted” and called the Super League an “absolute disgrace”. Southampton manager Ralph Hasenhuttl described the plan as “absolutely unacceptable”.
5. Will it actually happen?
The six English clubs have since pulled out – barely 48 hours after the announcement, so the project is hanging by a thread.
The league said it would now focus on efforts to “reshape the project”.
“Despite the announced departure of the English clubs, forced to take such decisions due to the pressure on them, we are convinced our proposal is fully aligned with European law and regulations,” said the statement.
“Given the current circumstances, we shall reconsider the most appropriate steps to reshape the project, always having in mind our goals of offering fans the best experience possible while enhancing solidarity payments for the entire football community.”
The Super League now needs another nine clubs to come on board. French champions Paris Saint-Germain, who are backed by Qatari wealth, are an obvious target. Germany’s Bayern Munich, the reigning European champions, are other notable absentees.
In a purely business sense, the plan has its merits. It is similar to the American model where sports teams compete every year without having to qualify or face relegation, giving certainty to investors and sponsors. It is probably no coincidence that, according to reports, the American-owned English clubs were key instigators.
The timing of the announcement was also worth noting. Uefa had been due to announce a major overhaul for the Champions League on Monday, expanding it to 36 teams with a new format and a sharp rise in the number of games. Some felt the Super League was a negotiating tactic, designed to win greater concessions and a bigger say for the major clubs.
However, a source told The Guardian: “Usually the threat of a super league is a bargain chip, and about leverage.
“But this is the furthest it’s ever gone by considerable distance.”